Prince Harry and Meghan 'paid off' man who owned Sussex website domain 'without argument'

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were moved to tears recently during a heartfelt visit to the family of a brave teacher. The Duchess of Sussex, who recently gave a rare insight into their family life in the US, and the Duke Of Sussex visited the loved ones of Irma Garcia, 48, who heroically gave her life to protect her young students during a tragic school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. Sadly, two days after the incident, Irma's husband Joe passed away from heartbreak.

It's only been two days since Gary Goldsmith entered the Celebrity Big Brother house, and he has already shared some insight on the Royal Family. However, the businessman, who is the uncle of Princess Of Wales Kate Middleton, caused some controversy during Wednesday's (6 March) show, when he discussed Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Meghan Markle is reported to be joining Prince Harry on his next UK visit after he announced he would be returning to London more often following King Charles' cancer diagnosis.

A Royal expert has suggested that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could potentially make a permanent return to the UK and the Royal Family.

Paul Burrell, the former butler to Princess Diana and footman to the late Queen Elizabeth II, has taken another swing at Prince Harry.The 65 year old's latest dig comes amid the recent verdict following Harry's legal battle with the Home Office. Back in February 2020, the Duke of Sussex took legal action after the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) decided he should receive a downgraded level of protection when visiting the UK.

believed to be “very keen” on being let back into the royal fold, and he could be doing just that with the “Suits” alum in arms.“It’s difficult to say given everything that has gone on and the trust that has been broken down whether they could return as full-time royals, but I’ve always said if Harry did return to the UK, it is possible,” Grant Harrold, who worked for the monarch for seven years when he was the Prince of Wales, exclusively told The Post.Still, Harrold noted that the family has some feuds to squash before conversations of a reunion could be had.“He could have a discussion with his brother about resuming his royal duties, but obviously there is so much that has happened over the last couple of years and that needs to be sorted out before the Sussexes made a permanent return,” the royal expert noted.“I don’t think it would be impossible — when I was working for the royal family, I saw how close William and Harry were, I don’t think that’s a relationship that is too far gone to be healed or fixed.”The former royal butler this week said that the father of two — who lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family — is still “privy to top-secret information” — despite being estranged from most of his loved ones.“Technically, he is able to step in for the king.

lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family and will now have to pay out of pocket for his family’s security when visiting the UK.Court documents have revealed that Harry even asked for the identity of who demoted the level of his personal protection on home soil.“I would like that person’s name,” Harry said, according to the 52-page ruling published Wednesday.Sir Peter Lane, the judge of the High Court in London, ruled that there was no unlawfulness in the initial decision to strip the Sussexes of their security.Harry could now potentially be made to foot a large bill to reimburse taxpayers’ legal costs after he was unable to prove that he had been treated “unfairly.”The exiled royal argued that he was not given the “same degree” of protection after quitting royal life, and even compared his situation to the dangers his late mother, Princess Diana, faced before her tragic death in 1997.Harry told a hearing that security concerns were preventing him from visiting his home turf.However, Judge Lane said that “there is no merit in this contention.”“The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children,” Harry last year told the court in a written statement read out by his lawyers.

Piers Morgan has once again taken a swipe at Prince Harry, this time over his recent legal troubles, as he labelled the prince a "c-list celebrity". Piers, 58, has been a vocal critic of the Duke of Sussex, 39, especially since he and his wife Meghan Markle, 42, decided to step back from Royal duties in 2020 and move to America, where they now live in a multi-million dollar mansion in Montecito, California.This week, Prince Harry lost a High Court case against the UK government regarding his personal security during his visits to the UK.The case began when the Home Office announced in February 2020 that they would no longer provide taxpayer-funded personal protection for Harry during his UK visits.The High Court recently upheld this decision.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were involved in what was described as a "near catastrophic" car chase last May after attending the Woman of Vision Awards. The couple were tailed by paparazzi for hours according to reports.

One royal expert believes that King Charles made a "big mistake" when he evicted his son Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from Frogmore Cottage and reportedly offered it to Prince Andrew.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may slowly turn back to part-time royal life, following their shock departure from officialduties in 2020.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly been in 'talks' to discuss an action plan moving forward if their efforts to fix the ongoing feud with the royals falls through.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced calls to be stripped of their royal titles following the launch of their new website, Sussex.com.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may not be on the same page when it comes to their future plans.

Prince Harryand Meghan Markle’s relaunched website and use of their official coat of arms could be telltale signs of an “internal conflict”, according to a royal expert. Last week, the couple replaced their Archewell website with Sussex.com, and included a notable change in logo from a calligraphed H&M to the couple’s coat of arms, which was designed for their wedding and approved by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2018.

Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle reportedly bought the domain for their controversial new Sussex website from a British tech businessman Neil Agate, The Sun has reported. According to the outlet, Agate, born in Sussex but currently resides in the US, registered the domain in 1995 and held on to it for almost 30 years until it was purchased by Prince Harry, 39, and Markle, 42, for an undisclosed amount.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle aware they have "went too far" with their attacks on the Royal Family and seem to be looking for "some sort of reconciliation", according to a PR expert.

visited the training camp for the 2025 Invictus Games in British Columbia on Wednesday.Their rep told the Mirror on Thursday: “We’ve heard time and time again that certain opportunities are make or break for the couple. They’re still here.”“They’re still working and pursuing what they believe in, despite constantly being challenged and criticized.

to Page Six.“The reality behind the new site is very simple — it’s a hub for the work the Sussexes do and it reflects the fact the family have, since the King’s coronation, the same surname for the first time,” an insider told The Times.“That’s a big deal for any family.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent Valentine’s Day together at the Invictus Games 2025’s Winter Training Camp in Canada. The estranged royals, who recently unveiled their new “self-serving” Sussex.com website, bundled up for the visit Wednesday to brave the frigid temperatures of Whistler, British Columbia.Markle, 42, dressed in a white sweater and white pants underneath a puffy beige coat and trotted next to Harry, 39, in a pair of fur boots.The red-headed “Spare” author wore blue jeans, a black puffer jacket, and a grey beanie for the appearance.