Meghan Markle is reported to be joining Prince Harry on his next UK visit after he announced he would be returning to London more often following King Charles' cancer diagnosis.
15.02.2024 - 20:45 / nypost.com
visited the training camp for the 2025 Invictus Games in British Columbia on Wednesday.Their rep told the Mirror on Thursday: “We’ve heard time and time again that certain opportunities are make or break for the couple. They’re still here.”“They’re still working and pursuing what they believe in, despite constantly being challenged and criticized.
This couple will not be broken,” their camp stated.Some weren’t happy with the couple’s vacation to the great maple country following King Charles’ cancer diagnosis. Their scathing statement comes after a source told the Telegraph that the “Suits” alum, 42, and Harry, 39, “have three days to prove they can behave” in Vancouver for the sports games.Harry and Meghan’s snow-filled trip comes just days after they launched their Sussex.com website and the prince’s quick trip to visit Charles, 75, amid his cancer battle in England.Harry went on an urgent trip to London on Feb.
6 due to his “worry” over his father’s illness — and his conversation with Charles only lasted for a reported 30 minutes. Harry and Meghan’s website was not well-received, with critics calling it “self-serving” for commercial gain.One penned, “Umm, these two nincompoops do realize they are not “Sussex,” right? The gall of buying Sussex.com, and including a royal crest, though they hate the royals, is ridiculous.”“’The Office of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’” Grandiose, arrogant & self-serving,” another user wrote.
“If this isn’t an attempt to pre-empt their anticipated removal from the Royal Family website (and other actions), it should be the catalyst to do so. Get on with it.”While the former actress’ coat of arms was branded on the re-vamped site, the “Spare” author’s seal was not used.Before the backlash,
.Meghan Markle is reported to be joining Prince Harry on his next UK visit after he announced he would be returning to London more often following King Charles' cancer diagnosis.
A Royal expert has suggested that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could potentially make a permanent return to the UK and the Royal Family.
Paul Burrell, the former butler to Princess Diana and footman to the late Queen Elizabeth II, has taken another swing at Prince Harry.The 65 year old's latest dig comes amid the recent verdict following Harry's legal battle with the Home Office. Back in February 2020, the Duke of Sussex took legal action after the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) decided he should receive a downgraded level of protection when visiting the UK.
believed to be “very keen” on being let back into the royal fold, and he could be doing just that with the “Suits” alum in arms.“It’s difficult to say given everything that has gone on and the trust that has been broken down whether they could return as full-time royals, but I’ve always said if Harry did return to the UK, it is possible,” Grant Harrold, who worked for the monarch for seven years when he was the Prince of Wales, exclusively told The Post.Still, Harrold noted that the family has some feuds to squash before conversations of a reunion could be had.“He could have a discussion with his brother about resuming his royal duties, but obviously there is so much that has happened over the last couple of years and that needs to be sorted out before the Sussexes made a permanent return,” the royal expert noted.“I don’t think it would be impossible — when I was working for the royal family, I saw how close William and Harry were, I don’t think that’s a relationship that is too far gone to be healed or fixed.”The former royal butler this week said that the father of two — who lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family — is still “privy to top-secret information” — despite being estranged from most of his loved ones.“Technically, he is able to step in for the king.
lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family and will now have to pay out of pocket for his family’s security when visiting the UK.Court documents have revealed that Harry even asked for the identity of who demoted the level of his personal protection on home soil.“I would like that person’s name,” Harry said, according to the 52-page ruling published Wednesday.Sir Peter Lane, the judge of the High Court in London, ruled that there was no unlawfulness in the initial decision to strip the Sussexes of their security.Harry could now potentially be made to foot a large bill to reimburse taxpayers’ legal costs after he was unable to prove that he had been treated “unfairly.”The exiled royal argued that he was not given the “same degree” of protection after quitting royal life, and even compared his situation to the dangers his late mother, Princess Diana, faced before her tragic death in 1997.Harry told a hearing that security concerns were preventing him from visiting his home turf.However, Judge Lane said that “there is no merit in this contention.”“The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children,” Harry last year told the court in a written statement read out by his lawyers.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were involved in what was described as a "near catastrophic" car chase last May after attending the Woman of Vision Awards. The couple were tailed by paparazzi for hours according to reports.
One royal expert believes that King Charles made a "big mistake" when he evicted his son Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from Frogmore Cottage and reportedly offered it to Prince Andrew.
Good Morning Britain presenter Kate Garraway once pointed out an inaccuracy in a statement from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex which announced the christening of their daughter Lilibet.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may slowly turn back to part-time royal life, following their shock departure from officialduties in 2020.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly been in 'talks' to discuss an action plan moving forward if their efforts to fix the ongoing feud with the royals falls through.
visit to Canada ahead of the 2025 Invictus Games go? It seems like it went pretty perfectly, as a matter of fact. The couple even shared a previously unseen photo of themselves from the One Year to Go Dinner in Vancouver.The photo, published in , shows Meghan in an olive green gown by Canadian designer Greta Constantine, with a draped, single-shoulder neckline which she accessorized with a simple diamond chain necklace. The better to show off the dress, Meghan wore her hair up in a slick bun with a side-part.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have had to 'pay up' for their new website as they work on changing their brand. The Duke and Duchess wanted to start fresh and use their Sussex title but to do this, they had to give money to the person who owned the rights to the Sussex.com website. They paid the owner "without argument", writes The Mirror.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a return to the public stage last week as they travelled to Canada to attend the Invictus Games One Year To Go Event. The couple were in the picturesque ski resort for two days to highlight next year's event and were all smiles as they returned to the country where they fell in love.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may not be on the same page when it comes to their future plans.
Prince Harryand Meghan Markle’s relaunched website and use of their official coat of arms could be telltale signs of an “internal conflict”, according to a royal expert. Last week, the couple replaced their Archewell website with Sussex.com, and included a notable change in logo from a calligraphed H&M to the couple’s coat of arms, which was designed for their wedding and approved by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2018.
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle reportedly bought the domain for their controversial new Sussex website from a British tech businessman Neil Agate, The Sun has reported. According to the outlet, Agate, born in Sussex but currently resides in the US, registered the domain in 1995 and held on to it for almost 30 years until it was purchased by Prince Harry, 39, and Markle, 42, for an undisclosed amount.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle aware they have "went too far" with their attacks on the Royal Family and seem to be looking for "some sort of reconciliation", according to a PR expert.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been out on public duties once again as they spent the final day of their Canada trip at a curling rink in Vancouver. Prince Harry was spotted trying out wheelchair curling, alongside Canadian singer Michael Buble as Meghan Markle watched on from the side-lines. As well as wheelchair curling, Michael Bublé performed a rewritten version of Frank Sinatra's classic My Way, in a nod to the Duke at a gala dinner.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have responded to claims that their upcoming trip to Canada for the Invictus Games is a 'make or break' moment for their relationship with the Royal Family. A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex told The Mirror: "We've heard time and time again that certain opportunities are make or break for the couple.They're still here.They're still working and pursuing what they believe in, despite constantly being challenged and criticised.This couple will not be broken." The pair were spotted looking happy and loved up on the ski slopes in Vancouver, Canada, on Valentine's Day.This marked the start of a three-day visit tied to next year's Invictus Games.They were seen laughing and joking together, with Meghan even taking a photo to send back to their children, Archie and Lilibet.
to Page Six.“The reality behind the new site is very simple — it’s a hub for the work the Sussexes do and it reflects the fact the family have, since the King’s coronation, the same surname for the first time,” an insider told The Times.“That’s a big deal for any family.