Oprah 'distances herself' from Harry and Meghan with Coronation statement

The Coronation of King Charles is just weeks away, and there are still a number of questions surrounding the attendance of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex previously confirmed that the couple had received an invitation, however they are still yet to publicly announce whether they will be in attendance.

Prince Harry has prepared a witness statement in the lawsuit he and several others have brought against Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), the publisher of various publications including the UK’s Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s attendance at King Charles’ Coronation has got to be the most talked about royal issues of the moment.

The Royal Family is said to have drawn up two plans for the King’s Coronation – which depend on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s attendance.The King’s big day is set to take place on 6 May and a spokesperson for the royal pair has confirmed that they have received an invite. However, while Charles' big day is just weeks away, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are yet to confirm if they’ll attend or not. Following their invite, Harry and Meghan have reportedly been in conversations with Charles and Buckingham Palace, sharing a series of demands for a possible trip to the UK.

The jury is still well and truly out on whether or not Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be at King Charles' Coronation on May 6.

Piers Morgan resigned from Good Morning Britain after refusing to apologise for not believing Meghan Markle's account of life in the Royal Family. However, the 57-year-old broadcaster has now questioned why he didn't receive the same "solidarity" that Gary Lineker recently did for his own situation. One source claimed that Piers' comment was a reference to his former GMB colleague Susanna Reid, who returned to the airwaves immediately after the episode, without making a stand for Piers.

Leaked rehearsal plans for the upcoming Coronation of King Charles III reveal that there is currently no place for Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle in the procession to follow the king’s crowning in Westminster Abbey.

The odds of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attending King Charles' Coronation have been slashed by bookies.

Meghan Markle was left comforting husband Prince Harry after he received a shocking text message from his brother Prince William in a clip that has now gone viral online. The touching moment was first shown in the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s controversial Netflix documentary and a clip of it has now resurfaced.

Thanks to the ongoing intrigues of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, last week was a momentous roller coaster ride for Britain’s royal family. Events swung from cheers for the king for taking decisive action by evicting the rogue Sussexes from Frogmore Cottage, to Harry and Meghan’s surprise announcement that their children will use the titles of "prince" and "princess."  And then there was Harry’s pay-to-view therapy session with a controversial trauma expert again exposing his family and extolling the joys of hallucinogenic drugs.

As Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle confirm they’ve been in talks with King Charles’ office about whether they‘ll attend the Coronation, royal expert Tom Bower told us their strained relationship with the royal family is beyond saving. He claimed the “selfish” and “unintelligent” Harry doesn’t understand his actions mean there can be “no way back” for a family reconciliation.

LIVE – Updated at 14:00Harry and Meghan’s children Archie and Lilibet have not yet been invited to King Charles’s coronation in May, according to news reports. The Telegraph on Saturday (11 February) reported that Archie and Lilibet’s participation will be discussed after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirm their own attendance at the royal ceremony. Questions over whether the couple will attend the King and Queen Consort’s coronation are still hanging over the occasion.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children will "not be invited to King Charles' Coronation in May, it has been claimed. Whilst Archie, three and Lilibet, 21 months, are thought to have been deemed "too young" to attend the ceremony at Westminster Abbey on 6 May, Queen Consort Camilla's grandchildren are expected to be invited in an official role.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly looking to purchase a second property after the news broke that King Charles III asked them to vacate their previous digs, Frogmore Cottage in Windsor. While still keeping their base in LA, it’s been rumoured the couple are looking to buy in a different country, with Harry apparently being drawn toward a private island somewhere.

’s children are using the titles Prince Archie and , and the official Buckingham Palace website has now been updated to reflect the change. Having previously been listed as “Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor” and “Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor” on the  website, their names now appear as “Prince Archie of Sussex” and “Princess Lilibet of Sussex,” falling at numbers six and seven in the order of succession.It comes amid  over whether Prince Harry and Meghan will attend  in May. The official Royal Family website has been updated and Meghan referred to their 21-month-old daughter for the first time publicly as “Princess Lilibet” in a statement . Although neither she nor her brother, Archie, age three, were granted the titles at birth as they were not grandchildren of the monarch, they gained the right when their grandfather, King Charles III, acceded to the throne in September. Princess Lilibet Diana was christened last week. By on Wednesday that Prince Harry and Meghan held a christening for Princess Lilibet last Friday, in a small ceremony at their California home.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s updated titles have been added to the royal family’s official website.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have declared that Lilibet’s princess title is her “birthright” in a new statement. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirmed their 21 month old daughter was christened last week as Princess Lilibet Diana. The intimate ceremony was held at the Sussexes’ home in Montecito, California, with around 30 people in attendance.

still “master” and “miss” on Wednesday.Despite being used for the first time Wednesday, the young royals were officially free to use them once their grandfather, King Charles III, ascended to the throne in September after the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II.The palace waited for Harry and Meghan to take the lead by using the titles first, sources told The Times of London.It comes despite the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s ever-growing rift with Harry’s family, leaving it unclear if they will even attend his dad Charles’ coronation as king.Markle had used the lack of a “prince” title for Archie — who turns 4 in May — to justify some of her most explosive attacks against the royals in her initial interview with Oprah Winfrey.When asked if the lack of title — and the security that comes with it — was “because of his race,” Markle appeared to agree.“All around this same time — we have in tandem the conversation of, ‘He won’t be given security, he’s not going to be given a title,’ and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born,” replied the former actress, whose mother is black.However, royal experts quickly pointed out that Archie had been too far down the line of succession to get the title, which changed when they rose the ranks once their grandfather became king.Archie is sixth in line for the throne, one place ahead of his sister, who turns two in June.Despite now being prince and princess, neither are a His or Her Royal Highness, or HRH, the UK Times said.“The use of the style HRH would come through their father and the Duke of Sussex’s HRH is in abeyance,” a palace source told the UK paper of the decision after he quit life as a senior royal.Lilibet was christened by the

Prince William, Kate Middleton, King Charles and Camila, Queen Consort, all opted not to attend the christening of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughter, Lilibet, despite being invited to the private ceremony.A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan confirmed to ET that an intimate ceremony was held last week at their home in Montecito, California, for the couple's 21-month-old daughter. «I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3, by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Rev. John Taylor,» the spokesperson shared.According to, the ceremony was attended by 20-30 guests including Lilibet's godfather, Tyler Perry, an unnamed godmother and Meghan's mother, Doria Ragland.Although the royals were not in attendance, ET can confirm that Lilibet’s title of princess is in line with the precedent created by the letters patent issued by George V in 1917, which conferred the title of prince or princess on male line grandchildren of the Sovereign, meaning she and her brother, Archie, 3, have been able to hold the titles since Charles' accession.The royal family's absence comes after months of turmoil between Harry, Meghan, William and Charles, following the release of Harry's memoir,.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughter Lilibet was called Princess for the first time at her christening, which was recently held at the couple's home in Montecito, California. Harry, 38, and Meghan, 41, who are also parents to Archie, three, held an intimate ceremony at their mansion on 3 March for their one year old daughter with around 20-30 close friends in attendance.